“CNN was not under traditional corporate control, so it could present news without worrying about who or what was impacted; its always-on format meant the newsroom was not under the obligation to craft events into satisfying packages for a single evening broadcast; its position on the cable dial lowered expectations for high-budget production values; and, finally, its freedom from traditional narrative made it less suspect in the post-Watergate era. Like Ted Turner himself, CNN would be renegade, free of corporate or government control, and utterly uncensored. This is why the network came under such widespread attack in its earlier days from traditional news media, academics, and politicians. Contrary to journalistic standards of the day, CNN let Saddam Hussein speak directly to the American people.”
More from Douglas Rushkoff
“Our current tax policy rewards capital gains (extraction) with a very low tax rate, while…”
“Bernie Sanders’s impact is limited because he attacks business and billionaires. That’s…”
“Think of almost any television commercial: A person gets in terrible trouble, the product…”
“The network is still controlled centrally by an authority, but it functions in a…”