“The aesthetics of the bourgeoisie demand that their art should be valued to the degree of its appeal to human and aesthetic universals rather than to the specifics of the here and now: even though some art may be 'realistic' and refer explicitly to the details of the everyday, the middle-class 'appreciation' must be able to look through these to the 'universals' underlying them. Relevance to one's immediate social context is not a middle-class criterion for the evaluation and enjoyment of art.”
More from John Fiske
“Popular discrimination is thus quite different from the aesthetic discrimination valued so…”
“There is little historical evidence to suggest that any form of radical art has produced a…”
“The left's concern for the interests and wellbeing of the powerless and the weak, and its…”
“Popular culture is made by the people, not produced by the culture industry. All the…”