“Strategy No. 4: Drop an opposition research bomb on Trump
Speaking of which, I often see reporters speculating or predicting that the Clinton campaign is sitting on one or two major pieces of opposition research about Trump, which they’ll leak to the press at a time of maximum strategic advantage. There’s reason to be skeptical of these claims: If the Clinton campaign had something great, wouldn’t they have released it already, especially given that people are already voting in many states?
But the FBI news may slightly increase the chance that we’ll see counter-attacks against Trump. Especially if the polls do tighten, the usually risk-averse Clinton campaign may become more willing to push a story that has some risk of backfiring (say, a serious accusation against Trump that isn’t backed up by more than one source). News organizations and their potential sources may also become more willing to run with these stories if the election becomes closer, taking on more legal and reputational risk, whereas they’d bypass them if Clinton seemed to have the election in the bag.”
More from Nate Silver
“Gillibrand’s most natural path might be to start with Party Loyalists and build out a…”
“As Trump’s problems mount, the media’s obsession with Clinton’s email server–literally the…”
“The thing that we are waiting to see though is that most of this notion that this race is…”
“Whenever the race tightens, we get people protesting that the popular vote doesn’t matter…”